Website sitemap

Buckinghamshire and Thames Valley Solicitors

B P Collins LLP is a consistently successful full-service law firm based in
Gerrards Cross with a proven reputation for representing clients effectively.

Call: +44 (0) 1753 889995
Email: enquiries@bpcollins.co.uk
Find us: map and directions



B P Collins Solicitors: talk to the experts

Gerrards Cross: +44(0) 1753 889995

SCA Packaging v Boyle case settled

Practice group: Employment law


17 August 2010

Bookmark and Share

For the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA), someone has a disability if they have a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. If the impairment ceases to have such an effect, it is to be treated as still having that effect if it is likely to recur.

Furthermore, an impairment which would be likely to have a substantial adverse effect but for the fact that measures are being taken to treat or correct it is to be treated as having that effect.

In SCA Packaging Ltd. v Boyle, one of the claims Mrs Boyle brought against her employer was that she had suffered disability discrimination because SCA Packaging had failed to make reasonable adjustments to take account of her throat condition. She had undergone surgery to remove nodules from her vocal chords and several months of speech therapy, after which she continued with a strict regime that involved voice exercises, resting her voice, sipping water and trying not to raise her voice. She attributed the non-recurrence of the nodules to her adherence to this regime of preventative measures. She argued that a planned removal of office screens would require her to speak more loudly, but SCA Packaging denied that she was disabled for the purposes of the DDA.

The House of Lords ruled that in determining whether an impairment would be likely to have a substantial effect without the measures taken to treat or correct it, 'likely' means only 'could well happen'. The more exacting test, whereby 'likely' was held to mean 'more probable than not', should no longer be used. It is sufficient to establish that the condition 'could well recur'.

Having established that Mrs Boyle was disabled for the purposes of the DDA, the case was returned to the Employment Tribunal for hearing on its merits. However, it has recently been announced that Mrs Boyle has agreed to settle this and her other claims of sex discrimination, victimisation and unfair selection for redundancy for £125,000. The settlement was agreed without admission of liability on the part of SCA Packaging Ltd.

Contact partner and practice group leader, Jo Davis, for advice on any discrimination law matter on 01753 279029, complete the online enquiry form or email employmentlaw@bpcollins.co.uk.

Legal services for business:
Charity law
Commercial property
Corporate and commercial
Employment law
Environment law
Litigation and dispute resolution
Notary services
Property litigation
Technology and IP
Legal services for individuals:
Elderly client law
Employment law
Family law
Litigation and dispute resolution
Notary services
Property litigation
Residential property
Wills, trusts and probate
About us:
B P Collins LLP
Meet the lawyers
Awards and testimonials

Social media:
Follow on Twitter External site icon
Connect on LinkedIn External site icon
Like us on Facebook External site icon
Legal news:
Latest legal news
Legal news for business
Legal news for individuals

Events:
Events and seminars
Register for an event
Contact us:
Online enquiry form
How to find us

Sign up for our news
Subscribe to RSS feeds
Commercial Legal FAQs

Corporate Responsibility